|
By: GREYT 001
|
2025-07-03 10:26:23 |
|
|
We all warmed to Sam Mahon's passion for the environment, particularly on waterways. Some beautiful poetic writing - marred for some by a rather disjointed approach. Better editing perhaps. |
|
|
By: GISB 016
|
2024-10-23 14:59:38 |
|
|
Interesting but laboured. |
|
|
By: DUNED 004
|
2024-10-10 09:50:32 |
|
|
|
Lyrical writing about the environment, but somewhat disjointed in other areas. |
|
|
By: AUCK 122
|
2021-12-01 14:57:08 |
|
|
Beautifully written and very topical - only 3 had read it though which was disappointing! |
|
|
By: LEVIN 001
|
2021-12-01 14:56:04 |
|
|
|
The 6 of us at our meeting had a vigorous discussion about The Water Thieves - we all felt completely in sympathy with Sam Mahon's concern for the rivers everywhere, not just the Canterbury ones. Some readers were unable to cope with all the names, but those of us who really liked the book were not bothered by them. Sam Mahon's lyrical descriptions of scenery appealed to us all; much of the book is quite moving. All in all, a good book to have read. |
|
|
By: AKAR 001
|
2021-12-01 14:50:59 |
|
|
|
A vey factual and informative description of the activities that this group found necessary to draw the attention of the public to - the state of the rivers at that time and the action necessary to inform the public of conditions as they were. Although we agreed that some sort of remedy was necessary, none of us really enjoyed reading the book. |
|
|
By: WARK 005
|
2021-12-01 14:47:53 |
|
|
|
Good discussion - but general feeling was that the book ranged too widely - tramping/art/lobbying. Considerable concern about water problems but lack of appreciation of how bad things are in Canterbury. |
|
|
By: NAP 026
|
2021-12-01 14:44:37 |
|
|
|
Most people liked the book, especially the beautiful descriptions of the landscape/tramps. Some found the many meetings/people confusing. |
|
|
By: AKAR 002
|
2021-12-01 14:43:01 |
|
|
|
Very good discussion! Members of the group had varied opinions and this broadened the responses which followed. Main thoughts were along the lines of how far N.Z. had come in terms of protection of the environment - and the ideas of the 'Green Party' becoming more centrist and "acceptable". |
|
|
By: CHCH 247
|
2020-06-11 10:54:17 |
|
|
All 10 of us disliked the book, and several could not finish it, including our passionate non-fiction lover who chose it. It was disjointed and confusing with many random characters appearing without explanation. However several of us enjoyed the poetic writing and descriptions of the country; whilst others found this style "overdone". We admired Sam's commitment to environmental issues. We did have a very good discussion. |
|
|
By: NELS 040
|
2019-08-05 15:02:23 |
|
|
|
Funny, passionate, and in need of a good edit BUT that would have removed all the good bits. |
|
|
By: AUCK 039
|
2019-08-05 15:00:07 |
|
|
|
We all enjoyed the first 3 or 4 chapters but then found it rather it tedious. Great effort and good cause, but not that engaging for the reader. |
|
|
By: TAKA 001
|
2019-08-05 14:48:16 |
|
|
Most of us liked the book very much - especially the New Zealanders liked the tramping bits, and also knew quite a few people in the book. Very lively discussion, since the problem has become a lot worse. Some found the writing somewhat confusing with his jumping from WeCan to his private life to meetings to letter writing. |
|
|
By: AUCK 055
|
2019-08-05 14:45:06 |
|
|
|
Sam Mahon is a wonderful writer of descriptive prose, and we were all amazed at the lengths went to, to promote 'saving our rivers", along with a few other dedicated people. His life was on hold for 9 months helping to promote the cause - hard work, dedication and a sense of humour helped to keep him going. |
|
|
By: AUCK 015
|
2019-08-05 14:39:43 |
|
|
|
There were very different responses. One person who was born in the area really appreciated the excellent descriptions and lovely language, and found it an interesting read. Others in the group felt it was very Canterbury centric and the narrative jumped a lot. They also noted there was a lot of 'name dropping' and too many people were included in the book. They considered that photos of the damaged rivers would have been more appropriate to include than some of the paintings. The group appreciated the questions in the Book Notes. |
|
|
By: CHCH 095
|
2019-08-05 14:32:07 |
|
|
|
We thought it was very worthwhile, and certainly reinforced the need to care for our environment for future generations. While the writing was a bit disjointed, the local connection added to the read. |
|
| |
